You have to convince Apple to let that happen, not Oracle or the Virtualbox user forum.

The moral of the above: Apple are the folks who say you can't run OSX on non-Apple hardware. OK, Oracle, go ahead and make OSX GAs! Megaza will foot the bill! (Get a credit check on him, though, see if he has a few hundred millions lying around first.) You want to pay the legal fees? You want to have Virtualbox taken away and never be able to have it again? Any continuation of this discussion in the path you're taking it, will result to 'print posts > /dev/null', at a minimum.Īpple's lawyers will care. But bitching and moaning 'oh, this is three years old, fix it' can have only one outcome, and one outcome only. If you really want to help, have the abilities, the hardware and the know how, by all means do. So, at the risk of losing the site or you, the choice is quite clear. We really love this site, way more than we love you (nothing personal). If Apple decides to sue Oracle for helping with breaking their EULA, then Oracle will pull their support for the site. This is a users' site supported by Oracle. Nothing will change unless there is legitimate demand. The problem is that twice you failed to understand the fundamentals and/or read the thread and the logic behind it. Megaza wrote:Problem is in your opinion which is 3years old and has not changed (the same goes with virtualbox functionality)

Mac os x vmware guest additions